Abstract
Preserved among the official writings of Blessed Solanus Casey is a document that has received almost no scholarly attention, a handwritten novitiate notebook in which the young friar composed “Means for Acquiring the Love of God”, five formation principles and two supplementary resolutions. This essay argues that these novitiate principles were not preliminary exercises later superseded but became the precise and enduring structural framework of Casey’s pastoral ministry across six decades. Through close reading of the novitiate texts alongside Casey’s Collected Writings, the biographical and timeline pages of solanuscasey.org, the beatification Positio and key secondary sources, each of the five principles is traced into its concrete expression at the monastery door. The argument is new: no prior scholarship has analyzed Casey’s ministry through the lens of his novitiate formation program. Contemporary significance lies in what this continuity demonstrates: integrated interiority is not incidental to pastoral effectiveness, it is its source.
I. Introduction — A Neglected Primary Source
Among the dozens of items preserved in the Collected Writings Attributed to Blessed Solanus Casey, OFM Cap., notarized by Charles Dillen and accessible through solanuscasey.org, one document stands apart for its brevity, its early date and its near-total neglect in the secondary literature. The official Capuchin Life page of the Solanus Casey Center records that “very early in his religious life, Blessed Solanus formed the practice of writing simple resolutions as reminders to guide him on the way of perfection. In the novitiate he began writing these resolutions in a little notebook which today is preserved among his own writings.”1 The result was a structured personal formation program organized under two headings: “Means for Acquiring the Love of God,” comprising five principles and “To Preserve God’s Presence,” comprising two supplementary resolutions.
Casey arrived at St. Bonaventure Monastery in Detroit on Christmas Eve 1896 and was invested as a Capuchin novice on January 14, 1897. He professed his first vows on July 21, 1898, his solemn vows in July 1901 and was ordained to the priesthood with the simplex restriction that would define his ministry on July 24, 1904.2 The novitiate notebook predates by years the pastoral ministry that would make him one of the most sought-after spiritual counselor in 20th century Roman Catholicism. Its contents are not retrospective analysis but prospective commitment: a young friar writing down what he intended to become.
This essay proposes a thesis that is, to the author’s knowledge, entirely new in Solanus Casey scholarship: the seven principles of his novitiate formation program became the precise structural framework of his adult pastoral ministry. What he formed in himself, he transmitted to others. The interior architecture of the novice became the pastoral method of the porter. Reading the novitiate notebook alongside the documented record of Casey’s ministry reveals not coincidence but continuity. A man who lived, with extraordinary fidelity across six decades, exactly the resolutions he had written as a young friar.
The contemporary significance follows directly from this thesis. Formation programs in seminaries, schools of theology and ministry training institutes routinely distinguish spiritual formation from pastoral formation, treating them as parallel but separable tracks. Casey’s life demonstrates that this separation is artificial and ultimately counterproductive. In him, the two were one, the same principles that formed his interior life expressed themselves directly and visibly in his pastoral practice. Recovering that continuity is among the most urgent tasks facing ministerial formation in 2026.
II. The Novitiate Notebook — Text and Context
The full text of Casey’s “Means for Acquiring the Love of God,” as preserved and published by the Blessed Solanus Casey Center, reads as follows:3
1. Detachment of oneself from earthly affections––singleness of purpose.
2. Meditation on the Passion of Jesus Christ.
3. Uniformity with the Divine Will.
4. Mental Prayer–– meditation and contemplation.
5. Prayer––“Ask and it shall be given to you.”
To these he added two supplementary principles under the heading “To Preserve God’s Presence”:4
1. Raise your heart to Him by frequent aspirations.
2. Make a good intention at the beginning of each week and frequently during its execution.
The Solanus Casey Center’s commentary observes that these principles “form a very worthy program to help one advance along the way of holiness” and expresses confidence that “Fr. Solanus found them to be a reliable guide on his way to perfection.”5 What this commentary does not undertake and what this essay now attempts, is to trace each principle systematically into its concrete expression in Casey’s pastoral ministry.
Two contextual observations are essential. First, the five “Means” are not original to Casey; they reflect the inherited formation vocabulary of late-nineteenth-century Franciscan and Capuchin spirituality, drawing on Francis of Assisi, Bonaventure and the Capuchin reform. Casey was not inventing a spirituality but appropriating a received one as his own. What is theologically distinctive is not the content of the principles but the fidelity with which he lived them and the transparency with which that interior fidelity expressed itself in outward pastoral ministry.
Second, the notebook must be read alongside Casey’s own consistent definition of religion, repeated across his letters and identified by the Solanus Casey Center as a signature formulation: religion is “the science of our happy relationship with and our providential dependence on God and our neighbor.”6 This dual orientation toward God and neighbor simultaneously is the hermeneutical key to the novitiate resolutions. The “Means for Acquiring the Love of God” were from the outset not purely vertical but inherently relational, designed to form him for both.
III. Point One — Detachment as Pastoral Availability
The first formation principle, “detachment of oneself from earthly affections, singleness of purpose” is foundational to everything that followed because it is the specific interior quality that made Casey’s presence at the monastery door so consistently described as unhurried, undivided and complete. This is not a personality trait; it is a formed virtue and the novitiate notebook identifies precisely the practice through which it was formed.
The Capuchin Life page of solanuscasey.org records that when Casey was assigned to the porter’s role in Yonkers, his first pastoral posting after ordination, visitors encountered something unusual: a priest with no apparent competing agenda. He “took great pride” in his menial tasks and was never observed to treat the monastery door as a prelude to something more important.7 The site confirms that it was precisely in this humble role that Casey “became a much-loved and sought-after counselor,” suggesting that the quality of his availability, itself the fruit of detachment, was pastorally more powerful than any formal ministerial function.
The phrase “singleness of purpose” is equally significant. Casey’s purpose, as he articulated it in his definition of religion, was the cultivation of happy relationship with God and neighbor, not the production of measurable religious outcomes. This singleness meant that he did not evaluate pastoral encounters by their results. The Message page of solanuscasey.org documents that his care extended without distinction to people “from every age and walk of life”, Catholics and non-Catholics, believers and non-believers, the desperate and the merely curious.8 This radical, undiscriminating availability is the pastoral expression of the first novitiate principle: a self no longer anxious about its own standing or effectiveness and therefore genuinely free to attend to whoever stood at the door.
The man who wrote “detachment of oneself from earthly affections” as a novice in 1897 was the same man who, from August 1924 to July 1945, spent twenty years at the door of St. Bonaventure Monastery in Detroit.9 He is described in every surviving account as having never turned anyone away, never hurried anyone, making even those of no religious background feel, in Leo Wollenweber’s documented characterization, that “every visitor was important to Solanus.”10 The continuity between novitiate resolution and pastoral practice is too precise to be coincidental.
IV. Point Two — Meditation on the Passion and Ministry to the Suffering
The second formation principle, “meditation on the Passion of Jesus Christ,” connects directly to the largest and most documented dimension of Casey’s pastoral ministry, his care for those in severe physical and existential suffering. The Message page of solanuscasey.org records that throughout his assignments in Yonkers, Manhattan, Harlem and Detroit “the sick especially were anxious for his priestly visits and consolation.”11 His approach to suffering was not therapeutic in the contemporary sense; he did not primarily offer emotional processing. He offered something theologically more demanding: an invitation to locate personal suffering within the economy of Christ’s redemptive Passion.
For the simplex friar who could not preach doctrinally, hear confessions or administer anointing and who was, by the conventional clerical calculus, nearly useless at a sickbed, this meditation on the Passion was not optional but existentially necessary. It was what enabled him to sit with the dying without the armor of sacramental function, doing so as a genuine participant in suffering rather than a professional manager of it. His letter to a grieving woman, preserved in the Collected Writings, captures this: he promised to pray for her intention and to “foster confidence in God and in the intercession of our blessed Mother Mary.”12 The instruction is not a denial of her pain but an invitation to relocate it within a larger theological frame, the direct pastoral application of his second formation principle.
How thoroughly this meditation had been internalized appears in the testimony of witnesses to Casey’s own final illness. When his physical condition deteriorated severely, a witness recorded his response, “Would to God it were ten thousand times worse so that I would have something to offer God in thanksgiving.”13 This statement is intelligible only against decades of meditative formation in the theology of suffering as Christological participation. It is the utterance of a man for whom Christ’s Passion is not a historical memory but a present grammar, the framework within which every instance of suffering, including his own, is interpreted and offered.
The pastoral application appears consistently across his notebooks. When Casey recorded the case of Audrey Tank, a nineteen-year-old for whom doctors declared “only a miracle will cure her,” he did not offer false comfort. He invited her family into a specific act of hopeful trust, a promise made in advance of the hoped-for outcome.14 Acknowledging suffering honestly while inviting the sufferer to receive it within a larger theological frame: this is the direct pastoral expression of his second novitiate principle.
V. Points Three and Four — Divine Will and Mental Prayer
Uniformity with the Divine Will: The Theology of “Thank God Ahead of Time”
The third formation principle, “uniformity with the Divine Will” is the theological root of Casey’s most characteristic and most widely documented teaching. The Blessed Solanus Casey Center identifies “Thank God ahead of time” as the organizing center of his spirituality,15 and it appears throughout his personal correspondence. It is neither a psychological technique nor a form of religious optimism. It is the practical expression, distilled into a single instruction of the third novitiate principle that the divine will, whatever its particular shape in any given circumstance, is inherently worthy of gratitude before its full contour becomes visible.
A 1946 letter to his niece Helena Wilhite articulates the theological depth of this principle with unusual explicitness, “Let us thank God ahead of time for whatever He foresees is pleasing to Him,… leaving everything at His divine disposal, including with all its circumstances when, where and how God may be pleased to dispose the events of our death.”16 The comprehensiveness of this surrender, extending deliberately to the manner and timing of one’s own dying, is achievable only by someone who has spent decades actively practicing “uniformity with the Divine Will.” Casey could invite others into this surrender because he had already made it himself repeatedly across a lifetime of limited ministry, involuntary assignments and physical suffering. The novitiate resolution had become second nature.
The pastoral power of this teaching resided not in theological sophistication but in personal credibility. When Casey instructed a care-seeker to thank God ahead of time, that person was looking at a priest who had been ordained with severe canonical restrictions, assigned without consultation to menial tasks across multiple cities and who had maintained across all of it a visible and genuine equanimity. The instruction was convincing because the man giving it was its living proof.
Mental Prayer: The Contemplative Foundation of Active Ministry
Fourth formation principle, “Mental Prayer-meditation and contemplation,” represents the contemplative infrastructure on which every other dimension of Casey’s ministry depended. The Capuchin Life page of solanuscasey.org records that from the earliest days of his religious life, Casey’s “intense devotion to the Eucharist was fostered in the hours before the Blessed Sacrament.”17 This daily practice was not separate from his active ministry at the door; it was its inexhaustible source. The man who was available without anxiety, present without competing agenda and peaceful in the face of others’ severest distress was so precisely because contemplative union had formed in him a habitual orientation that persisted into every pastoral encounter.
Casey’s door ministry drew dozens of people daily, a volume of pastoral demand that under ordinary psychological conditions, would produce precisely the exhaustion, distraction and superficiality that the testimonies uniformly report he never exhibited. What protected him was not extraordinary personal resilience but the daily renewal of contemplative union that his fourth formation principle prescribed and that he practiced without exception across his entire ministerial life. That this practice made possible what personal endurance alone could not is among the most important lessons his novitiate notebook offers contemporary formation programs.
VI. Point Five and the Supplementary Resolutions: Petition and Intentional Living
Fifth formation principle, “Prayer-‘Ask and it shall be given to you’” and the two supplementary resolutions complete the program and illuminate its final two pastoral expressions, intercessory confidence and structured intentionality in daily life.
The fifth principle draws directly on Matthew 7:7, a text whose promise Casey appears to have received with full theological literalness throughout his ministry. His notebooks document case after case in which he enrolled care-seekers in the Seraphic Mass Association, a network of Masses offered by Capuchins worldwide, and directed them to ask God with confidence for the specific grace they needed.18 This intercessory confidence was not naïve. Casey was well aware that divine response to prayer does not always take the shape the petitioner requests. However, the fifth formation principle had formed in him an unconditional confidence in the fact of divine responsiveness, a confidence that transmitted itself visibly to care-seekers and that, according to multiple testimonies in the official Positio, was itself often the decisive factor in their spiritual turning.
The two supplementary resolutions address the problem of spiritual continuity: How does a person maintain the fruits of prayer across an active day? This is first achieved by raising the heart to God by “frequent aspirations,”-a form of the classical prayer of recollection consisting of brief, deliberate turns of attention toward God distributed throughout ordinary activity. Second, making “a good intention at the beginning of each week” provides a structured intentionality, orienting every week’s activity toward God before it begins.
These principles explain one of the most consistently remarked features of Casey’s ministry, his spiritual attentiveness was not confined to dedicated prayer time. The Message page of Casey records that he “was ready and willing to listen to anyone anytime.”19 A notebook entry from Volume IV illustrates this in specific detail. Casey received Lou Landreville, a thirty-two year old hospitalized for thirteen years following a broken back, documented his history and current spiritual state, noted his recent intensification of prayer, enrolled him in intercessory prayer and recorded the developing improvement, all with the same quality of attention visible in every other entry.20 The supplementary resolutions had formed in Casey the capacity to be fully present not only during formal prayer but throughout the whole day. That sustained presence is what made his ministry at the door what it was.
VII. From Formation to Transmission: Casey’s Pedagogy of Interior Life
The significance of the novitiate notebook extends beyond documenting Casey’s personal spiritual formation. It reveals that his pastoral ministry was at its core a ministry of transmission: he gave to those who came to his door not primarily practical advice or intercessory services but the formation he had himself received and lived. The care-seeker who left with the instruction to “thank God ahead of time” had received, in condensed form, Casey’s third novitiate principle. The suffering person invited to offer their pain in union with Christ’s Passion had been drawn into his second. The family in crisis enrolled in the Seraphic Mass Association had been given access to the intercessory confidence of his fifth.
This transmission was not didactic, Casey did not teach his formation program explicitly. It was experiential. Care-seekers encountered a man so thoroughly formed by these principles that they expressed themselves naturally in his manner of presence, his characteristic instructions and his consistent spiritual counsel. The novitiate notebook was the grammar; the ministry at the door was the language spoken fluently across six decades.
This pedagogical dimension is confirmed by the most authoritative external assessment of Casey’s life. The 1958 tribute of the Capuchin Minister General preserved on the official About page of solanuscasey.org, called Casey “an extraordinary example of a true Capuchin and a replica of [St. Francis].”21 The word “replica” is theologically precise, not an original but a faithful reproduction of a spiritual form. Casey replicated in his life and ministry the formation he had received and in doing so, made it available to the thousands who came to his door.
VIII. Contemporary Significance: Formation-to-Ministry Continuity
The diagnostic significance of this analysis for contemporary ministerial formation is sharp. Most seminary and ministry training curricula separate spiritual formation (prayer life, retreats, spiritual direction) from pastoral formation (preaching, sacramental practice, pastoral care skills) creating an implicit assumption that these are parallel but distinct competencies. The practical result is ministers who are spiritually educated but not necessarily spiritually formed, who know the theory of contemplative prayer but whose pastoral practice is not necessarily animated by it. Casey’s novitiate notebook exposes this separation as artificial and as a significant formation failure.
For Casey, there was no gap between formation and ministry. The formation program was itself a ministry program. Its five principles were precisely the interior dispositions that make authentic pastoral ministry possible. Detachment enables genuine availability. Meditation on the Passion enables genuine accompaniment of the suffering. Uniformity with the Divine Will enables genuine encouragement rather than false comfort. Mental prayer enables the sustained contemplative orientation without which pastoral presence degrades into professional performance. Intercessory confidence enables the minister to offer something the therapeutic and social services professions cannot, the assurance of communal prayer grounded in theological conviction. None of these capacities can be acquired through curriculum alone. All require the kind of sustained formation practice that Casey documented in his novitiate notebook and then lived without interruption for sixty years.
Pope Francis’s vision of a Church of genuine, present, unhurried meeting between persons22 requires exactly this formation-to-ministry continuity. The encounter Francis envisions cannot be produced by pastoral technique or programmatic initiative. It requires ministers who have been genuinely formed in interior availability, in the capacity to receive the other without agenda, in the confidence that God is present and responsive in every human meeting. These are precisely the qualities that Casey’s formation program was designed to produce and that his six decades of ministry demonstrate it produced with extraordinary consistency and across every conceivable pastoral context.
IX. Conclusion — The Novice’s Promise, the Porter’s Fulfillment
On November 18, 2017, seventy thousand people gathered at Ford Field in Detroit for the beatification Mass of Blessed Solanus Casey, with an estimated 250 million following online worldwide.23 What they came to celebrate was not primarily a wonder-worker or a theological innovator. They came to a man whose formation had become his ministry, whose interior life had so completely expressed itself in pastoral availability that the boundary between prayer and service had effectively dissolved.
That dissolution had its origin not at the monastery door but in the novitiate notebook. When young Bernard Casey sat down to write his “Means for Acquiring the Love of God,” he was performing an act that would, over the following six decades, bear fruit in six thousand documented pastoral encounters, in the founding of a soup kitchen that continues to serve the poor, in healings the Church has officially recognized as miraculous and in the quiet transformation of the countless persons who arrived at his door in desperation and left with something they had not been able to name until they experienced it: the peace of a person who had genuinely and completely given himself to God.
The novitiate notebook is a short document. Its seven principles fill a single page. But they are the most consequential primary source in Casey’s entire corpus, because they reveal that his pastoral greatness was not accident, isolated charism or inexplicable mystery, though it was certainly all three. It was also formation: deliberate, structured, sustained across a lifetime without interruption and transparently visible in everything he did at the monastery door. The novice’s promise and the porter’s fulfillment are one continuous act. In that continuity lies the most urgent and most practical word that Blessed Solanus Casey speaks to the American Church and its ministers today.
Bibliography
Armstrong, Br. Gregory, OFMCap. “Blessed Solanus Casey’s Pastoral Care: A Model of ‘Marian Referral.’” 2024-2025 Blessed Solanus Casey Graduate Essay Prize winner. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/solanus-research/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “About Blessed Solanus Casey.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “Call to Priesthood.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/call-to-priesthood-2/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “Capuchin Life.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/capuchin-life-2/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “Index of Writings.” Compiled by Edward Foley, Capuchin. Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/index-of-writings/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “Spirituality.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/spirituality/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “The Message.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/the-message/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “The Positio.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/the-positio/.
Blessed Solanus Casey Center. “Timeline.” Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/significant-dates-fr-solanus/
Casey, Francis Solanus. Collected Writings Attributed to Blessed Solanus Casey, OFM Cap. Notarized by Charles Dillen. 4 vols. plus appendices. Solanus Casey Center, Detroit. Accessed May 2026. https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/writings-of-solanus/.
Crosby, Michael, OFMCap. Blessed Solanus Casey: The Official Account of a Virtuous American Life. New York: Crossroad, 2002.
Crosby, Michael, OFMCap. Thank God Ahead of Time: The Life and Spirituality of Solanus Casey. Cincinnati: Franciscan Media, 2009.
Derum, James Patrick. The Porter of Saint Bonaventure’s: The Life of Father Solanus Casey, Capuchin. Detroit: Fidelity Press, 1968.
Gumpel, Peter, and Michael Crosby. Positio for the Cause of Canonization of Fr. Solanus Casey. Published by the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, July 11, 1995. Excerpts available at https://www.solanuscasey.org/about-blessed-solanus-casey/the-positio/.
Odell, Catherine. Father Solanus Casey: Revised and Updated. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor, 2017.
Pope Francis. “Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium.” November 24, 2013. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html.
Wollenweber, Leo, OFMCap. Gratitude and Grit: The Life of Blessed Solanus Casey. Cincinnati: Franciscan Media, 2022.
Wollenweber, Leo, OFMCap. “Introduction.” In God Bless You and Yours: Letters from Solanus Casey, OFM Cap., edited by Bernardine Casey. Detroit: Father Solanus Guild, 2000.
Wollenweber, Leo, OFMCap. “Seven Days with Solanus Casey: From Holy Life to Eternal Life.” Franciscan Media, February 24, 2024. https://www.franciscanmedia.org/franciscan-spirit-blog/seven-days-with-solanus-casey-from-holy-life-to-eternal-life/.